|
Post by Lord Abel on Aug 24, 2006 14:53:03 GMT -5
What i said about the scrolls is true, they are basically the old testament, and they translate extremely close to the present day bible, and sicentists have dated them back to the time they would have been writen, that is what i know about it, and the reason carbondating places the earth at 45 million years old or the like, is becasue when God created the earth, he created it already age, so when a argument like this one comes up, that there isn't clear evidence for either side of the argument, cause if sicence could prove the bible right, then what would be the point of faith, which is what God intended.
|
|
|
Post by Darth Nergul on Jan 4, 2007 19:21:59 GMT -5
They came at the same time? Or maybe due to evolution, the chicken evolved from something, and then layed the egg? Or maybe some egg came out of nowhere....
|
|
|
Post by Odan Thos on Jan 5, 2007 0:52:45 GMT -5
Okay. This is base off your beliefs. If you beleive in creation then the chicken came first because good created all animals on Earth at the same time... But if you are like me that believes in Evolutions then the egg came first. This is because genetic mutations and traits from parents (which would be a relieve of the chicken in this case) are passed on but do not developt until the next generation. So the egg would hold the first true chicken will what gave birth to it was a close retieve in the evolutionary chain.
|
|
|
Post by MikDaTv on Jan 5, 2007 2:52:45 GMT -5
unless god created the animals in their youngest form like say... an egg. no evididence to support this, just a what if.
|
|
|
Post by Lord Abel on Jan 6, 2007 17:59:59 GMT -5
How could the egg come first if the egg can't be hatced without the warmth from his mother sitting on it....the first chicken had to have been not an egg, other wise there would be no way for the chicken to be born.
|
|
|
Post by Lord Abel on Jan 6, 2007 18:00:47 GMT -5
So beliefs or not, logicaly the chicken had to come first anyway.
|
|
|
Post by MikDaTv on Jan 8, 2007 3:06:07 GMT -5
no, according to evolution the egg did since the first creature with the mutation that made it a chicken came from an egg layed by a creature like the chicken, but dissimmiler enough that they are considerd seperate species.
|
|
|
Post by Zilfer Of Shadows... on Jan 11, 2007 20:33:13 GMT -5
soooo
god = chicken
and evolution = egg
|
|
|
Post by Si Quan on Jan 11, 2007 20:35:21 GMT -5
I'm Catholic and believe in God, but still believe the egg came first.
|
|
|
Post by Zilfer Of Shadows... on Jan 11, 2007 20:47:04 GMT -5
riiight....
|
|
|
Post by Lord Abel on Jan 14, 2007 14:21:25 GMT -5
how si quan....I will never know...
|
|
|
Post by philly on Jan 14, 2007 16:42:14 GMT -5
how si quan....I will never know... He said he was catholic, not crazy.
|
|
|
Post by Zilfer Of Shadows... on Jan 14, 2007 16:53:32 GMT -5
WOOT^
|
|
|
Post by Si Quan on Jan 14, 2007 18:40:26 GMT -5
lol. Are you sure you're not crazy for not being Catholic?
|
|
|
Post by Zilfer Of Shadows... on Jan 14, 2007 19:09:00 GMT -5
i'm sure.
|
|